
TSLA Stock Under Scrutiny: Elon Musk Found to Have Misled Investors
A San Francisco federal court jury has delivered a unanimous verdict against Elon Musk, finding him to have been misleading in his public statements during the critical period surrounding his 2022 takeover of Twitter (now X). The lawsuit, brought by a group of Twitter investors, alleged they relied on Musk’s statements to their detriment.
The Core of the Case
During his testimony, Musk maintained he hadn’t misled investors, claiming his public comments and tweets were often misinterpreted. However, the jury determined that specific claims he made regarding Twitter’s user metrics – particularly concerning the prevalence of fake accounts (“bots”) – and his suggestions of potentially backing out of the $44 billion acquisition deal were intentionally misleading. This directly impacted the TSLA stock price.
The legal teams representing both Musk and the investors, led by Oregon small-business owner Brian Belgrave, have not yet issued public comments following the verdict.
A Pattern of Scrutiny, But a Mixed Record
This isn’t Musk’s first encounter with legal challenges stemming from his online activity. However, he successfully defended against a 2023 lawsuit filed by Tesla shareholders who claimed he misled them with posts about the electric vehicle company. This case, however, focused specifically on the impact of his statements on Twitter’s stock value.
Financial Implications for Investors
The jury found that Musk’s statements artificially lowered Twitter’s stock price by between $3 and $8 per share between May and October 2022. This could translate to substantial damages for investors who held the stock during that period, potentially amounting to thousands of dollars per investor. Monte Mann, a trial attorney specializing in business litigation at Armstrong Teasdale, emphasized the significance of the verdict: “If you move the market with your words, you own the consequences.”
The Timeline of Events
Beginning in May 2022, Musk began publicly questioning Twitter’s reported number of bot accounts. He initially placed the acquisition “on hold” before ultimately announcing his intention to withdraw from the deal altogether. Twitter subsequently filed a lawsuit to compel Musk to complete the acquisition, which he eventually did in early October 2022, at the originally agreed-upon price of $54.20 per share. He then rebranded the platform as X.
Investor Testimony: A Personal Account
Brian Belgrave, a key plaintiff in the case, testified that he sold his Twitter shares in July 2022, believing Musk would abandon the acquisition based on his public statements. He sold at a loss, significantly below the eventual purchase price offered by Musk. “I got screwed,” Belgrave stated. “I got cheated.”
Musk’s Defiant Testimony
During his testimony, Musk was often combative with the investors’ legal team, eventually refusing to answer questions with simple “yes” or “no” responses, arguing that the lawyers were attempting to mislead the jury. He conceded, “If this was a trial on whether I’ve made stupid tweets, I’d say I’m guilty.”
Broader Context & Related News
While this case focuses on the TSLA stock and Twitter acquisition, it highlights the increasing scrutiny of public figures’ statements and their potential impact on financial markets. Here are some other recent headlines:
- Scottish university students design tartan for US independence anniversary
- Airport delays due to US government shutdown
- Conflict escalates in the Middle East
Copyright 2026 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.




