
Who is Victor Marx? The High-Stakes Race for Colorado’s Governor in 2026
Colorado is approaching a pivotal political moment. With Governor Jared Polis reaching his term limit after eight years in office, the race to succeed him has ignited a fierce competition. At the center of this battle are two contrasting figures: the seasoned legal mind Phil Weiser and the disruptive newcomer Victor Marx.
As the November 3rd election draws near, voters are weighing two very different philosophies on how to tackle the state’s most pressing issue: affordability.
The Contenders: Experience vs. Influence
The race presents a fascinating study in political backgrounds. On one side, we have the Democratic nominee, Phil Weiser. The current Attorney General brings a prestigious resume, having served as the dean of the University of Colorado Law School and worked within the Obama administration. His approach is rooted in legal expertise and institutional stability.
On the other side is the Republican nominee, Victor Marx. A former Marine and founder of “All Things Possible Ministries,” Marx entered the race as a political outsider but with a massive digital footprint. Boasting a social media following of nearly 3 million, Marx leveraged his influence to defeat established legislators in the GOP primary, signaling a shift toward a more populist appeal within the party.
The Battle for Housing and Affordability
Both candidates agree that Colorado has become too expensive, but their solutions are worlds apart:
- Phil Weiser’s Plan: Focuses on aggressive growth, aiming for 40,000 new homes statewide. His goal is to ensure that essential workers, such as teachers and firefighters, can actually afford to live in the communities they serve.
- Victor Marx’s Strategy: Emphasizes the removal of “red tape.” Marx proposes cutting regulations and reviewing “cost-inflating mandates” to lower building costs. Additionally, he is pushing for significant property tax relief for seniors and families.
Economic Visions and the Budget Deficit
The next governor will inherit a structural budget deficit, leading to a clash over how to manage the state’s finances and the controversial Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR).
The Democratic Approach (Weiser)
Weiser suggests overhauling TABOR to allow the state to retain more revenue during surplus years. He is also eyeing efficiencies in Medicaid and proposes the appointment of a Chief Innovation Officer to modernize state government and stimulate economic growth.
The Republican Approach (Marx)
Victor Marx argues that Colorado simply has a “spending problem.” His solution? Zero-based budgeting. Marx intends to phase down the state income tax and eliminate fees that he claims are used to bypass TABOR restrictions. His priorities are clear: public safety, water infrastructure, and education.
A Diverse Ballot
While the spotlight remains on Weiser and Marx, other candidates are vying for attention. Among them is Greg Lopez, an unaffiliated candidate and former mayor of Parker, who proposes a “Department of Government Efficiency” and the creation of 25,000 starter homes.
Other candidates on the ballot include:
- Stephen T. Hamilton (American Constitution Party)
- Eric Mulder (Libertarian)
- Jeff Peckman (Unity Party)
- Erik Underwood (Approval Voting Party)
Final Thoughts: A Date with Destiny
Whether Colorado chooses the legal precision of Phil Weiser or the disruptive, regulation-cutting vision of Victor Marx, the result will redefine the state’s economic trajectory for the next four years.
Mark your calendars: Election Day is November 3rd.




