The Hidden Hand: How the US and Iran Collaborated on Deportations
In a startling revelation that contradicts years of public diplomatic hostility, newly released emails have exposed a clandestine working relationship between U.S. immigration officials and the Iranian government. These documents, made public by the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), detail a coordinated effort to deport over 100 Iranians between late 2025 and early 2026.
While the rest of the world witnessed mounting tensions and military skirmishes, behind the scenes, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Iranian Embassy were exchanging manifests and adjusting deportation lists.
Influence and Control: Who Decided Who Left?
One of the most controversial aspects of these leaks is the level of influence the Iranian government exerted over the U.S. deportation process. According to the emails, Iranian officials didn’t just accept deportees; they actively requested changes to the lists.
- n
- Last-Minute Changes: ICE officials admitted to adding specific cases to deportation flights at the direct request of the Iranian Embassy.
- Expedited Removals: Documentation shows requests to “amend the previous manifest” to speed up the removal of certain individuals.
- Direct Coordination: While some communication flowed through Qatari intermediaries in Doha, many emails reference direct meetings with the “Director at the Iranian Embassy.”
Prioritizing Deportations Amidst War
The timing of these operations is particularly jarring. The emails reveal that the push to remove Iranian nationals remained a “White House priority” even during a deadly 12-day conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran in June 2025.
Even as President Trump warned citizens to evacuate Tehran, the former acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons, was labeling the repatriation of Iranian immigrants as a top priority. Despite warnings from staff that Iranian airspace was closed and travel documents were unavailable due to the bombings, the mandate from the top was clear: find a solution immediately.
Human Rights Concerns and Legal Battles
Human rights activists are sounding the alarm, noting that returning individuals to a regime known for the violent persecution of political dissidents and religious minorities is a dangerous precedent. This marks a sharp departure from the U.S. tradition of providing sanctuary to Iranian exiles since the 1979 Revolution.
Furthermore, a lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C., alleges that the U.S. government may have illegally shared confidential asylum application records with the Iranian government. While the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has vehemently denied these claims, stating that they only coordinate travel documents, the emails suggest a level of intimacy that raises serious red flags.
Conclusion: A Contradiction in Foreign Policy
The release of these documents underscores a deep contradiction in U.S. foreign policy. As Jamal Abdi, president of the NIAC, pointed out, these actions undermine assertions that the U.S. is working to save Iranians from a repressive regime. Instead, the evidence suggests a pragmatic—and potentially perilous—collaboration focused on removals at any cost.
For more information on international human rights standards regarding deportation, you can visit the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
