Pam Bondi Deposition: DOJ Blocks Testimony in Epstein Investigation

temp_image_1775679084.579757 Pam Bondi Deposition: DOJ Blocks Testimony in Epstein Investigation



Pam Bondi Deposition: DOJ Blocks Testimony in Epstein Investigation

Pam Bondi Deposition Blocked: DOJ Cites Former Role

The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced Wednesday that Pam Bondi will not appear for her scheduled deposition in the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. This decision stems from Bondi’s recent departure from her position as Attorney General.

Roadblocks in the Congressional Investigation

This development represents the latest obstacle in Congress’s efforts to obtain Bondi’s sworn testimony regarding the Justice Department’s release of investigative files related to the late convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. The committee seeks to understand her role in overseeing the release of the so-called “Epstein Files.”

DOJ’s Justification

The DOJ argues that Bondi was subpoenaed in her official capacity as Attorney General, not as an individual. Assistant Attorney General Patrick D. Davis, in a letter to House Oversight Chairman James Comer, stated that because Bondi no longer holds that office, the subpoena no longer compels her appearance on April 14th. The DOJ has requested confirmation that the subpoena is withdrawn.

Congressional Response and Continued Pursuit

Despite the DOJ’s stance, the House Oversight Committee remains determined to proceed. A spokesperson for the Republican-led panel indicated they will contact Bondi’s personal counsel to discuss rescheduling the deposition. Representative Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the panel, emphasized that Bondi must testify regardless of her current title. He stated, “Our bipartisan subpoena is to Pam Bondi, whether she is the Attorney General or not. She must come in to testify immediately, and if she defies the subpoena, we will begin contempt charges in the Congress. The survivors deserve justice.”

Bipartisan Support for the Subpoena

The subpoena was issued with bipartisan support last month, with five Republicans joining Democrats in the effort. Representative Nancy Mace, who spearheaded the subpoena, asserted that it remains valid, stating that the subpoena was for “Bondi by name, not by title.” She expects Bondi to appear before the committee for a sworn deposition once a new date is set.

Pressure on Comer and Internal Debate

Even before Pam Bondi’s removal, there was internal debate within the committee. Some Democrats and Republicans were working to ensure the subpoena wasn’t rescinded, particularly after a contentious closed-door meeting with Bondi last month. Chairman Comer, who initially didn’t believe the subpoena was necessary, had previously indicated he would honor it. He now plans to consult with Republicans to determine the next steps.

Bondi’s Role in the Epstein Investigation

Bondi’s standing within the Trump administration was reportedly affected by her handling of the Epstein investigation. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated he would defer to Chairman Comer regarding the subpoena.

Source: CNN


Scroll to Top