Women’s Curling Scores Rocked by Controversy at the Winter Olympics
The recent Winter Olympics in Cortina d’Ampezzo have been anything but predictable, delivering both thrilling competition and unexpected drama. The sport of curling, traditionally known for its sportsmanship and self-governance, found itself at the centre of a storm, with accusations of cheating and subsequent rule changes dominating headlines. The focus? Intense scrutiny of players’ techniques and the integrity of women’s curling scores.
The Initial Accusations: Double-Touching and Heated Exchanges
The controversy ignited during a match between Canada and Sweden. Swedish players accused Canada’s Marc Kennedy of “double-touching” – illegally imparting additional momentum to a stone after its initial release. This sparked a heated verbal exchange, with accusations flying across the ice. While the result stood due to the sport’s self-governing nature, the incident didn’t end there. Video footage surfaced, seemingly confirming the Swedes’ suspicions. The question quickly became: where did this video come from?
Canada responded with claims of a pre-meditated “sting operation” by the Swedish team, alleging an attempt to catch Canadian players in a violation of the rules. This accusation further fueled the tension and raised questions about trust and respect within the sport.
Escalating Concerns and Rule Adjustments
The controversy continued to escalate when Switzerland also reported Kennedy for the same offense during their match. World Curling, the governing body, responded by deploying extra officials to monitor for double-touching. However, the implementation proved inconsistent, leading to further complaints from teams. Incidents involving both Canadian skip Rachel Holman and Team GB’s Bobby Lammie highlighted the difficulty in consistently identifying the infraction.
Faced with mounting pressure, World Curling adjusted the protocol, allowing teams to request monitoring of stone delivery for a minimum of three ends if they suspected a violation. However, even this revised system was criticized for its haphazard execution.
The Debate: Video Review and the Future of Curling
The incident has sparked a wider debate about the role of technology in curling. While the sport currently uses electric sensors to detect stones released before the hog line, many believe that video review, similar to VAR (Video Assistant Referee) in soccer, could be the next logical step.
Team GB lead Hammy McMillan voiced his support for video review, suggesting a challenge system where each team receives a limited number of challenges per game. “You bring in VAR or Hawk-Eye and each team gets a challenge or two, so you’ve got to be dead certain that somebody did that [violation],” McMillan stated. “I think that would be quite cool, it would maybe make curling a bit more modernised.”
Looking Ahead
The controversy surrounding womens curling scores at the Winter Olympics has undoubtedly shaken the foundations of the sport. As curling evolves, the debate over how to balance tradition with technological advancements will continue. The future of the sport may well depend on its ability to adapt and maintain the integrity of womens curling scores while embracing the tools available to ensure fair play. Stay updated on the latest womens curling scores and developments on the BBC Sport website.
Further Reading:
