Trinidad Chambliss’ Fight for Eligibility: A Deep Dive into the NCAA Lawsuit

The college football world is closely watching the unfolding legal battle between Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss and the NCAA. Chambliss is seeking a preliminary injunction to regain eligibility after the NCAA denied his waiver to return to the Rebels in 2026. The case centers around his medical history and the potential financial implications of being sidelined.

NCAA’s Response and the Documentation Dispute

On February 2nd, the NCAA filed a 27-page response to Chambliss’ request for a preliminary injunction. The core of the NCAA’s argument revolves around a lack of sufficient medical documentation to support Chambliss’ claim of being unable to play during his time at Division II Ferris State (2021-2024). The NCAA contends that Chambliss hasn’t provided evidence proving his incapacity during those seasons.

The NCAA also raised concerns about the broader implications of granting the injunction, stating that “collegiate sports will become ungovernable if eligibility determinations are instead the result of individual court decisions.” This highlights the NCAA’s desire to maintain control over eligibility rulings and avoid setting a precedent for future cases.

Chambliss’ Medical History and Supporting Evidence

Shortly after the NCAA’s filing, a letter from Dr. Anthony Howard, an otolaryngologist based in Michigan, was submitted in support of Chambliss. Dr. Howard details Chambliss’ struggles with recurrent throat infections stemming from a case of mononucleosis contracted in 2020. The letter outlines how these infections, coupled with poor sleep quality, daytime fatigue, and exercise-related airway discomfort, impacted Chambliss throughout the 2022 and 2023 seasons. Chambliss underwent a tonsillectomy in 2024 to address these ongoing issues.

The Financial Stakes: NIL Deals and NFL Potential

Chambliss’ lawsuit, spanning 34 pages, emphasizes the significant financial losses he could incur if deemed ineligible. He argues that his potential earnings in college, particularly through Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, far outweigh what he’s likely to earn as an early NFL draft pick. The lawsuit specifically states that being forced into the NFL draft prematurely could result in “monetary losses in the millions of dollars.”

Recent NFL mock drafts suggest Chambliss’ stock is indeed rising. The Athletic currently projects him as the No. 34 pick in the second round, potentially landing with the Arizona Cardinals. For comparison, Tyler Shough, a quarterback drafted in the second round of the 2025 NFL Draft, signed a four-year contract worth approximately $2.7 million annually. However, Ross Dellenger of Yahoo Sports reports that Chambliss’ deal to return to Ole Miss is valued at over $5 million, showcasing the lucrative opportunities available through NIL.

What’s Next?

A hearing for the preliminary injunction is scheduled for February 12th in the Calhoun County Courthouse. The outcome of this hearing will significantly impact Chambliss’ future and could set a precedent for how the NCAA handles eligibility waivers involving medical conditions and NIL considerations. This case is a prime example of the evolving landscape of college athletics and the increasing complexities surrounding athlete rights and compensation.

Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

Source: USA Today